Thursday, July 18, 2019

Don’t Do As I Do, Do As I Say, Jeramy Vine Post’s Biased Account Of Cabby

Jeramy Vine posted over social media a biased account of a female cyclist jumping the lights, nearly causing an accident. 

Vine is the last cyclist who should be complaining about bad behaviour on the road, as he was once clocked by a police speed gun doing over 3 times the speed limit through Hyde Park, on his way to work at Broadcasting House.  

Mr Vine is one of those cyclist who appears to believe that the regular rules of the road don’t apply to the Lycra clad commandos. 

Vine decided to barrack the London Taxi Driver in this incident, who was given no chance of stopping, as the female cyclist suddenly turned 90 degrees (through a red man signal) left in front of him on a pelican crossing. The startled driver shouted something (as you would) at the cyclist through his side window (which was open at the time). 

Mr Vine took great exception to the driver saying on his Twitter account ‘you wouldn’t act like that if it was your daughter”.
Well, Mr in a case like this where the cyclist was so obviously at fault and could of endangered other motorists, I would and most other Cabbies would.

See full video on Vine’s Twitter account:


Jeramy Vine did however admit in a subsequent post that the cyclist in the clip was most definitely at fault !!!

We noticed that Mr Vine hasn’t claimed to be the cyclist who made the video... as it actually shows (the cyclist filming), breaking the law by followed the lady and also jumping the red light and could possibly leave that person open to prosecution for committing a road traffic offence.  

Wednesday, July 17, 2019

Dublin’s Taxi Problem Worse Than London's: ‘There’s Just Too Many Cabs Here’

Parked at the end of a long queue of taxis that spill over into the adjacent lane near St Stephen’s Green, taxi driver Adidemi Lugboso (51) says there is one glaring problem he faces as a cab driver in the city.

“There’s too many taxis,” he says. “There’s as many taxis here as New York.”

Several taxi drivers said the number of cabs on the street can be overwhelming and the over supply was not enough for them to regulate unlicensed drivers.

“Nobody’s listening,” says David Heavey (57), waiting for a fare outside Dublin Castle. “If you report someone you never hear back.” (Sounds familiar)

“It just goes flying around in the cloud,” agreed Sean (53), who declined to give his last name. “Nobody ever acts on it. The punishment doesn’t fit the crime.”(again, sounds very familiar)

Waiting in line outside the Westbury Hotel on Grafton Street, he says he couldn’t remember the last time the enforcement team came to him to check on his details. 

Week nights

He maintains that customers focus too much on Friday and Saturday night when taxis are in high demand, but don’t care about the rest of the time when the streets are flooded with cabs.

“Where are you on Monday, Tuesday, Wednesday and Thursday, you know?” he says.

The DriverCheck app allows users to enter the number located on the side of the taxi and compare the photo and name to the person driving the car. If no information comes up, the driver is probably not licensed. The problem, according to the drivers, is there is little enforcement.

Pulling on a cigarette next to his taxi parked in the line along the quays, Seán Nolan (44) agrees with the claim of a lack of oversight and response to illegal taxi drivers.

Checking on drivers

“We can’t make a complain,” he says. “If we find a taxi on the rank that is isn't legitimate, or not on the driver check app, we can’t report them. It has to be a customer [who reports them]. What use is that because not all customers will check the system to see if that driver is legit.”

Nolan, like many other drivers, does not see the introduction of Uber as contributing to their problems. Unlike in many other countries, Uber drivers in Ireland must be licensed in the same way as taxi drivers.

“That’s about the one good oversight that government does have on a taxi,” says Nolan. “That Uber can’t come into the country and just send anybody. I had to be vetted. Every man here had to be vetted. Uber can’t vet the way our police force can vet.”

Tuesday, July 16, 2019

Surprise, Surprise ViaVan Given 3Year Licence By TfL, To Use Euro 6 Diesel Mercedes

Surprise, Surprise....ViaVan, the joint-venture between Via and Mercedes-Benz Vans in Europe, has been granted a new 3-year Private Hire Vehicle Operator's license to continue to operate so called 'on-demand shared transport' in London by Transport for London, using vehicles that the London Taxi Trade have been banned from using...euro 6 Diesel engine Mercedes Vitos and Vaneos, now lumped together and called V-class .

Keith Prince asked the Mayor why black cabs can't licence euro 6 Mercedes Vito vans anymore, but his new shuttle bus pilot schemes can. 

It's one rule for everybody else and draconian rules for the black cab trade under Sadiq Khan.

ViVan launched in April 2018 and said it has provided more than 7 million rides in London and saved 3 million vehicle kilometers by pooling multiple passengers into shared vehicles, resulting in more than 600,000 kilograms of CO2 saved.

Keith Prince AM also asked Mike Brown why Transport for London won't let the cab trade use Euro 6 Mercedes Vito vehicles when new on-demand buses can. It's one rule for the black cabs, another for everyone else

ViaVan said that by using technology from U.S. provider Via, ViaVan has proven to be a strong solution for public transport operators and partners, not only in London with TfL but across the UK in both rural and urban areas.

Chris Snyder, ViaVan CEO said, ‘We are proud to receive the renewal of our license in London. 
We believe that ViaVan’s focus on smart, shared mobility is part of the solution to achieving the Mayor’s goal of 80% journeys by public transport, walking or biking by 2041.’

So ViaVan who recently were in trouble for there advert on TfL stations showing a ViaVan driver breaking the law, picking up passengers on a zebra crossing (advert was banned by TfL but can still be seen on stations and tube trains) are now considered to be part of the Mayor’s Public Transport?

Snyder went in to say, ‘To actually get Londoners out of private vehicles and on-board with the city’s goals, it’s necessary to provide a technology-driven solution that combines the efficiency, comfort and convenience of a personal vehicle with the affordability and traffic-reducing benefits of public transport’.

ViaVan recently hit the headlines with its adverts on the TfL transport system. The advert showed a group of passengers, boarding a Mercedes side loader Private Hire vehicle, that was stopped on a zebra crossing. 

Also at the bottom of the advert, was the claim London's smartest and greenest the company use Diesel engines and not electric powered vehicles, this statement is false. 

Taxi leaks complained to both the advertising standards agency and TfL and neither replied. So we asked the LCDC to put in a complaint on our behalf, this they did. 

TfL came back with a statement saying that no action would be taken against ViaVan as the contract for the adverts was to run out shortly. But unlike young ladies in swimsuits that appeared to offend Mayor Khan, you can still find the ViaVan advert on certain rude trains and stations across the TfL network. 

Another advert that was (supposed to be banned, the one TfL actually apologised for, showing an unsavoury character with the words 'When you recognise your blind date from the news, get out of here Kapten', can also still be seen on TfL tube trains. 

It would appear that only adverts showing offensive food, or beautiful young ladies are removed immediately by TfL working on behalf of the Mayor.....but offensive, lying adverts from foreign minicab operators may only be removed eventually, when TfL get round to it.....which could be some time in the future.....or not perhaps. 

Monday, July 15, 2019

After His Refusal To Call For A Ban On E-Scooters, Should Mike Brown Be Replaced In The Interest Of Public Safety ?

Asked about the dramatic rise in the illegal use of e-scooters by commuters in in light of recent fatality, Mike Brown dismissed calls for a ban saying riders need to be more careful. 

And now a 14-year-old boy who crashed his electric scooter in Beckenham is fighting for life.

Has Mike Brown's decision been swayed by the fact that his largest stakeholder Uber (largest on demand e-scooter supplier in California) will be pushing to operate in London???

Taxi Leaks would pitch the question, in the interest of public safety, is in time for Mike Brown to be moved on, and a new, responsible commissioner appointed to replace him???

Road safety campaigners called for a crackdown after the second accident in 24 hours involving the battery-powered vehicles in London.

The teenager is thought to have lost control riding on the pavement and collided with a bus stop at about midday on Saturday, according to The Sun. 

He suffered a serious head injury and was airlifted to another hospital - where he remains in a critical condition.

A day earlier, TV presenter and YouTube star Emily Hartridge , 35, died when her motorised scooter collided with a lorry in Battersea.

Nick Lloyd, head of road safety at the Royal Society for the Prevention of Accidents, said: “While there has only been one death in the UK there have been a number across Europe.”

Electric scooters are illegal to ride in public in the UK. Most users are unaware that e-scooters that reach speeds of 40mph can only be used on private land.

Anyone currently riding them the roads in London, risks a £300 fine and six points on their driving licence (if they have one), while those that ride them on the pavement face a £30 penalty.
It hasn't gone unnoticed that the Police in Central London are turning a blind eye to the use of e-scooters. 

The Metropolitan Police said: ‘Police were called to Monks Orchard Road, Beckenham, at 11.42am on Saturday, 13 July to reports that a teenage boy had crashed an electric scooter.

‘Officers attended along with the London Ambulance Service and London’s Air Ambulance.

‘A 14-year-old boy was found with a serious head injury after it was reported his scooter had collided with a bus stop. He was taken by Air Ambulance to hospital where he remains in a critical condition.

‘His next of kin have been informed. 
Enquiries into the circumstances continue

Skydiving Wives Raise £7,000 For Taxi Charity For Military Veterans

On Tuesday 9 July at Old Sarum Aerodrome, two Taxi Charity for Military Veterans committee wives, Anne Parsons from West Ealing and Susy Goodwin from Ware, completed tandem skydives with The Red Devils.

The jump was postponed from the original date of 1 May due to low cloud and high winds, resulting in a ten-week delay. 
However, the extra time allowed the girls to gain further funds and they have raised, in total, a staggering £7,000.

Their adrenaline-fuelled experience began the second they left the plane at 12,000 feet, free-falling through the clouds at 120 mph for forty-five seconds. 
Once through the clouds, their parachutes were deployed, allowing these brave ladies to enjoy spectacular views of the Wiltshire countryside as they floated down, landing gently in the drop zone, thanks to the skills of their respective Red Devil.

Susy carried veteran Ted Pieri’s beret. Ted, who passed away in January aged 92, was the first person to do a fundraising skydive for the Taxi Charity and in doing so started a bit of a trend. He was a member of 250 Light Composite Coy. RASC. 1st Airborne. 

Susy Goodwin say’s "Climbing through the clouds we reached 12,000 feet. The instruction came to put on our goggles and wait to move to the now open door. Sitting on the edge of this little plane and staring into the clouds beneath us, for some insane reason I thought it would be like jumping onto a 13-tog duvet covered with cotton wool and shaving foam! But I loved it and would I do it again- yes in a heartbeat"

Ian Pieri, Ted’s son said "How great that Susy completed the jump successfully. My dad would have been absolutely thrilled and so very proud of you. It was both wonderful and emotional to see you with Dad’s picture and his beret. It made my week."

Anne Parsons dedicated her jump to close family friend Major Justin van der Pant late 7 Para RHA. Justin passed away in 2016 at the age of 48. 
Anne Parsons said, "I was extremely honoured to jump in Justin’s memory." and his widow Jennifer said afterwards: "Justin would be so proud of you for being so brave and raising all that money."

Would the ladies do it again?

"Absolutely," said Susy, who clearly relished the idea of a second jump.
Not so Anne, who despite the amazing experience, announced her immediate retirement from skydiving to pursue non-adrenaline adventures.

TAXI LEAKS EXTRA BIT : About the Taxi Charity

The Taxi Charity for Military Veterans was formed in Fulham in 1948, to work for the benefit, comfort and enjoyment of military veterans and arranges many trips every year for veterans from all conflicts. 

The charity offers international trips to Holland, Belgium and France, UK day trips to concerts or museums, transport to attend fundraising events, as well as special days out to catch up with friends and comrades.

To fund and facilitate these outings, the charity is wholly reliant on generous donations from members of the public, businesses and trusts and the amazing group of London licensed taxi drivers who offer their time and vehicles free.


To find out more about the charity or to donate visit the website

Twitter @TaxiCharity



For more information, to arrange interviews or to request images please contact

Christina Bowden

Bowden PR 

07984 433614

Sunday, July 14, 2019

Tower Hamlets - Determined To Displace Traffic From The More Affluent Localised Areas, Onto Less Affluent Sean Paul Day

Why are local authorities - such a Tower Hamlets - determined to displace motor traffic from the more affluent localised areas onto less affluent ones such as the Mile End Road 

Why do TfL and the local authorities sell the notion that they can reduce emissions on a street by street basis? 

Why is it that a lot of the roads being closed to through traffic are the more affluent local ones?  Kensington & Chelsea, for example,  have the second longest life expectancy in the country yet they have some of the heaviest urban traffic flows? 

The ‘localised’ clean air policy is absurd! The much vaunted 9k deaths per year never seems to fluctuate and is never explained in regional differences? 

Surely, those living near the busiest roads would have the highest mortality rates? The data doesn’t even filter out respiratory conditions caused by smoking or industrial pollutants and doesn't clearly explain what "early death" is?

The main factor, is poverty - it kills far more people than emissions. Those living below the poverty line tend to have a worse diet and more medical complications than those on average earnings and are therefore more susceptible to ‘early’ death.

We do need to plan for the future and reduce on a global basis our human detritus but this will need to be done from a much wider perspective than the one adopted by our local authorities and TfL. 

We badly need the Department of Transport to instigate a review of road and traffic planning in our major cities so that the response is balanced and not the scalpel approach that makes motorists the cancer and local politicians the scalpel. 

Creating binaries for taxi drivers which could economically disadvantage them is hardly an incentive for them to invest in ULEV.  And if we argue against all motor traffic then we cannot ignore the fact that hidden consumption pollution due to to cycle lanes  is extremely high.

The main point to remember is that we all need the transport network for everything we consume. Waging war on commercial vehicles is akin to sawing off your own arm. 

In short, ill thought out road closures that make life harder for regular, working class people to go about their daily chores is not the way forward and is brought about by a disconnect with residents  and an ignorance to local needs! 

The borough councils could start by listening to local concerns…just don’t hold your breath for too long waiting.

Here what Cllr Margaret Cooper had to say about the Tredegar Road experiment 

Please support the residents of E3 by signing their online petition :

Also, support this campaign by following @justice_local on Twitter 

TfL’s Own Case Law Says Taxis Should Be Allowed To Use Bus Lanes ... It’s On Their Website !

Remember the judgement in the case bought by Eventech, a subsidiary of Addison Lee, against black cabs (Taxis) being given the right to use Bus Lanes.....well it seems Sadiq Khan, TfL and a number of local councils seek to have forgotten. 

The most relevant two paragraphs read: 
Mr Justice Burton agreed, noting in his High Court judgment: `There is to my mind a clear distinction between the need of black cabs (and their passengers and the public) for them to be in the bus lanes, by way of visibility and availability of, and access to, black cabs for those hailing a cruising taxi'.

He went on to note: 'I consider it makes entire good sense for black cabs to be travelling in bus lanes. Minicabs just do not have the need to use the bus lane, and black cabs do'.

The case was defended by TfL.... so what has changed?
What new legislation has been bought in to change this situation?
Are TfL, Sadiq Khan and local councils acting illegally ?

Who’s out there fighting your corner ?

Below is the complete notice posted on the TfL website :

Judgment notes TfL policy does not appear to the ECJ to involve state aid nor confer, through State resources, a selective economic advantage

Transport for London (TfL) has today welcomed the judgment of the European Court of Justice (ECJ), in Luxembourg, on the case brought by Eventech, a subsidiary of Addison Lee, that challenges TfL's policy of allowing taxis, but not private hire vehicles, to use bus lanes in the capital.

In its judgment, the ECJ recognised that taxis are distinct from minicabs noting the former's "legal status, are in a factual and legal situation which is distinct from that of minicabs, and consequently those two categories of vehicles are not comparable".

The ECJ notes that drivers of taxis are subject to strict standards in relation to their vehicles, their fares and their knowledge of London, whereas those standards do not apply to minicabs.

The ECJ goes on to recognise that only taxis can ply for hire, they are subject to the rule of 'compellability', they must be recognisable and capable of conveying persons in wheelchairs, and their drivers must set the fares for their services by means of a taxi meter and have a particularly thorough knowledge of London. Concluding that in that context, the bus lane policy does not confer a selective economic advantage on taxis.

Leon Daniels, TfL's Managing Director of Surface Transport, said: `Our policy on bus lanes was upheld by the High Court. We welcome the opinion from the Advocate General and now the European Court of Justice, but ultimately await the decision of the Court of Appeal. As this process continues we are maintaining our well-understood and effective policy that helps to keep London moving in the interest of everyone.'

In the original Judicial Review proceedings in 2012, TfL explained to the court that taxis are allowed to drive in bus lanes because they can ply for hire, whereas minicabs cannot. It would be more difficult to hail a taxi, especially on a busy road, if the vehicle concerned was not near to the kerb. Unlike minicabs, taxis are required to be wheelchair accessible and their ability to use bus lanes is of great benefit to wheelchair users. 

Allowing tens of thousands of minicabs to drive in bus lanes would also impact on the reliability of bus services and risk inconveniencing the six and a half million passengers who travel on buses each day.

Mr Justice Burton agreed, noting in his High Court judgment: `There is to my mind a clear distinction between the need of black cabs (and their passengers and the public) for them to be in the bus lanes, by way of visibility and availability of, and access to, black cabs for those hailing a cruising taxi'.

He went on to note: 'I consider it makes entire good sense for black cabs to be travelling in bus lanes. Minicabs just do not have the need to use the bus lane, and black cabs do'.

The proceedings were brought by Eventech, a subsidiary of Addison Lee, against the Parking Adjudicator, which arose from Penalty Charge Notices issued by Camden Council for illegal use of the Southampton Row bus lanes. Both the London Borough of Camden and TfL were named as interested parties. The High Court upheld TfL's bus lanes policy in 2012 and the Court of Appeal hearing took place in April 2013.

There are around 23,000 licensed taxis in London and approximately 53,000 licensed minicabs in the capital.