Email sent to a considerably large list:
Once again it appears we see that Uber are trying to escape the fact that they are blatantly a Private Hire Operator with insistence that they are a “Third party technology company”
However.. on May 2nd 2017 two Uber representatives attended the Brighton & Hove Taxi Trade Forum meeting:
• Helen Fletcher - Senior Compliance & Litigation Counsel at Uber
• Emilie Boman - Senior Public Policy Associate at Uber
The Brighton & Hove Taxi Trade representatives refused to acknowledge the presence of Uber at that meeting of May 2nd 2017 as being a legitimate trade representative .
This was based on a statement made by Mr Fed Jones (Head of Cities for Uber) who was present at a previous Trade Meeting held in December 2016.
At that December meeting Mr Jones denied that Uber was a ‘Private Hire Operator’ insisting that it was a ‘Technology Company’.
At the meeting on May 2nd 2017 the trade read out a statement at the beginning of the meeting stating:
“Until ‘Uber Britannia Ltd’ concedes it is a ‘Private Hire Operator’ it will not be recognised by members of the BHTTFA.”
However the response from Helen Fletcher was.. as quoted in the councils own Minutes were:
“Helen Fletcher who was present as Uber’s lawyer / representative at the Forum meeting confirmed that Uber are a private hire operator in the Brighton and Hove area and are also licensed in 70 other jurisdictions in the UK”.
It is clear and evident that at the Brighton & Hove Taxi Trade Meeting on May 2nd 2017 Uber Britannia Ltd officially acknowledged that it was indeed a ‘Private Hire Operator’
If there is any necessity of proof that Uber Brittania Ltd is indeed a ‘Private Hire Operator’ then this evidence supplied directly from UBL itself should be used.
GMB – Brighton & Hove Taxi Section
MORE GOOD NEWS FROM THE FRONT LINE: