Friday, October 23, 2015

Brighton And Hove Council Licence Uber As PH Operator.


UBER, COMING TO THE STREETS OF BRIGHTON.

The company had applied for a licence to operate in the city. A decision was put on hold earlier this week. 

But earlier today we were informed that Uber will now be granted a private taxi hire operator’s licence by Brighton & Hove City Council.

The council says it is minded to grant a licence for a year from its launch date, yet to be announced. 

Councillors on the panel have agreed Uber can operate initially for a year to test their commitment to meeting the city’s taxi service standards. 

They would have to abide by all the conditions in the Blue Book – a set of guidelines for the local cab trade.

Going by Ubers past performance, they run roughshod over regulations, saying it's easier to seek forgiveness than permission. 

Uber stated at a licensing committee meeting on Monday’s that they wanted to be treated the same as every other operator in the city.  They would only be allowed to send Brighton & Hove-registered drivers to pick up customers.

Uber In Brighton: Taxi operators express  much 'concern':

Other taxi operators shared their concern at Monday's meeting about the company operating on an un-level playing field. 

However at this stage they were not able to provide detailed information about commencement dates and service details.  Work on these could not start until the firm was certain they would obtain a licence.

All Uber drivers will have to hold the same licence as any other private hire driver, which includes a check by the Disclosure and Barring Service (DBS), successor to the Criminal Records Bureau (CRB).

Uber representatives told the panel they were already licensed in 33 council areas in the UK, though not yet operating in all of them.

Panel chair Cllr Mo Marsh said:  “We want Uber to compete on a level playing field by signing up to the terms of the Blue Book.  They made a commitment to do that in public and this one-year permission will test the strength of that commitment.”

Perhaps Cllr Mo should have also insisted that each vehicle should carry hire and reward insurance as a protection to passengers and other third parties. Uber have already received fines in London for falling to oversee their "partners" ar fully insured.  


Should be very interesting to follow this story, considering the homophobic views of many of Uber's drivers.






4 comments:

Anonymous said...

Is it not the case that B&H council insist on the operators phone number being displayed on the cars??

Anonymous said...

https://www.brighton-hove.gov.uk/sites/brighton-hove.gov.uk/files/Blue%20Book%203rd%20Edition%20approved%206%203%2014.pdf

Mike Hughes said...

Brighton has the same knowledge requirements for PH and taxis. Although there is no legal requirement to have a meter in a PH most do. In such a case they are required to have the meters (which can be set for any value) certified by the Council. Part of that is that they must display the amount on a tariff card displayed inside the vehicle where passengers can easily see it.

Most PH work as part of circuit with taxis and their meters are set the same. There are many variations in the rates to take into account weekend working, more than 4 seats, etc

Having worked Brighton, I can say that the enforcement, although by no
Means good, is significantly better than London.

I don't think Uber could get enough drivers if they were to comply with the rules in Brighton.

It remains to be seen what actually happens!

Sean Day said...

I must never forget the Behemoth that is the consumer. Oh, and choice, don't forget choice. Except when it comes to others choice, then i can quite easily forget about that. I mean why would I want my right to choose be hampered by someone else's rights? Hang on, I haven't thought about that much. Whatever, let's offer those confined to a wheelchair ino choice at all, I not gonna even consider a hearing loop for those who have difficulty hearing. God forbid I offend anybody's religious beliefs, so it's best to leave the partially sighted or blind person reliant on their guide dog to the discretion of the actual driver. And the gays, not everyone wants to subjected to open displays of affection, it's in the drivers best interest to aggressively throw them out.

It's ok, I'm hardly bothered by those who want alternative ways to pay, cash will soon be illegal anyway and because I don't accommodate anyone-gay or straight- without a credit card or smartphone then, well, that's thats their choice innit! Mind you if the tip is in cash..... Consumer's right to choose. Don't forget it. I might get a job one day which pays enough money so I can also be a consumer.