Friday, June 07, 2013

Court Ruling Allows New Taxi and Car Services To Be Street Hailed In Outer Boroughs of New York.

New York yesterday:

A court  of appeal has thrown out the lawsuit, a last minuet injunction that stopped the use of hailing apps by limousine car services and Taxicabs opening the doors to Uber.

More importantly, Mayor Bloomberg has backed up his threat to "destroy" their "fucking industry" by winning a court ruling which will now allow people in outer boroughs to hail new Taxi and car services without pre booking, changing laws that have stood for many years.

This article from the Verge :


A New York City court ruled today that people can use smartphone apps to digitally hail taxicabs, clearing the way for a new pilot program set to launch soon. The ruling is a move forward for proponents of the technological advance, and for the New York City Taxi & Limousine Commission (TLC), which adopted the measure in December. Several car services and the Livery Roundtable (a union which represents nearly 20,000 livery drivers) sued the TLC in February, arguing that the program would violate city codes, and that discrimination based on location, age, and race, could ensue. The court threw out that lawsuit today, following a last-minute injunction against taxi-hailing apps in early May.

In New York City, taxicabs can only be hailed in person, while car services can be arranged in advance. This has caused contentious debates surrounding services such as Uber, which, in other cities, make possible the hailing of both black car services and the less costly taxicabs.

To further complicate matters, car service (i.e., non-medallion cars) hailing is only legal within the confines of Manhattan, with the outer boroughs (where cabs are fewer) served primarily by livery services available using smartphone applications and call-ahead services. Mayor Michael Bloomberg's administration, however, today won a ruling in Albany which would allow people in the outer boroughs to hail car service cars without pre-arrangement, changing the longstanding laws against the practice. Bloomberg's relationship with the TLC has been extremely strained, with the New York Post reporting that the mayor vowed to "destroy" their "fucking industry" in late May when asked about his plan to replace all taxicabs with the fuel efficient Nissan NV200, a measure which the TLC opposes.

Once instituted, the pilot program allowing smartphone hailing will be available to all New York City cab drivers, though participation will be optional. In a statement to Bloomberg, Mayor Bloomberg said, "In New York City in 2013, common sense and the free market say that you should be able to use your smartphone to get a cab, and that’s why we created a pilot program to allow users to do just that."

This from the Wall Street Journal:

The state Court of Appeals unanimously upheld Mayor Michael Bloomberg’s plan to allow a new class of taxi service in boroughs outside Manhattan, reversing a lower court that said the mayor had skirted City Council opposition by going to the state legislature instead.

The ruling is a major victory for Mr. Bloomberg on one of his signature efforts to reform the way New York City’s taxis, liveries, black cars and limousines operate.

In this case, Mr. Bloomberg and Taxi and Limousine Commission Chairman David Yassky have said they want to allow up to 18,000 livery cars to begin offering street-hail service in areas that are under-served by the existing city fleet of 13,000 yellow cabs, which do virtually all of their business at the city airports and in Manhattan’s business and nightlife districts.

But a state court judge in Manhattan declared the so-called “boro taxi” plan unconstitutional in 2012, deciding that Mr. Bloomberg had violated the Home Rule provision of the state Constitution, among other provisions. The state law was an end-run around the City Council, which had traditionally set the city’s taxi rules, Justice Arthur Engoron ruled.

The court of appeals unanimously overruled that reading in the decision released Thursday, saying that the taxi law addressed “a matter of substantial State concern,” which justifies the legislature’s role in passing the plan.

all 64 news sources »

1 comment:

tecnology said...

Thanks for nice post